Following the severe flash floods that struck Nepal on August 26, humanitarian organizations are navigating the complex transition from immediate life-saving operations to long-term recovery. Drawing on research from the 2015 earthquake, which claimed nearly 9,000 lives, experts emphasize that the choices made in the coming weeks will define the country's future resilience.

A primary recommendation for aid agencies is the use of direct cash transfers. Research into the 2015 disaster response showed that providing survivors with cash through local banks allowed households to prioritize their own essential needs, such as food, medicine, and rent, while simultaneously supporting local markets. This approach has been echoed by the United Nations, which advocates for cash assistance to maintain the dignity of affected families.

However, the transition from emergency relief to development remains a significant hurdle. Post-2015 reviews indicated that many aid organizations remained trapped in a "delivery mode," focusing on short-term necessities rather than long-term infrastructure, such as restoring water systems or supporting agricultural livelihoods. Experts warn that temporary housing projects, which consumed over half of the funding after the 2015 earthquake, should avoid elaborate, imported designs. Instead, success is more likely when aid agencies utilize local materials and train local tradespeople to build durable, permanent structures before the onset of winter.

Advertisement

Geography also presents a new challenge. Unlike the post-earthquake recovery, where rebuilding often occurred on original sites, the current flood recovery may require relocating entire communities to avoid future risks from glacial melt. These decisions must be made urgently to prevent temporary settlements from becoming permanent, substandard housing.

Corruption and bureaucratic delays also remain significant risks. With Nepal ranking 109th out of 181 countries on Transparency International’s corruption index, aid agencies are urged to resist bribery and ensure that funding is not misappropriated. Ultimately, the success of these efforts depends on treating survivors as active participants in their own recovery rather than passive recipients. Past data revealed that three-quarters of residents felt their specific needs were ignored by aid providers in 2015, highlighting a critical need for agencies to prioritize continuous, inclusive community engagement.

Source: The Conversation