The United States government has expressed significant reservations regarding Australia’s proposed digital duty of care legislation, which would require social media platforms to provide users with the option to disable algorithmic feeds. In a formal submission, the US embassy in Canberra warned that the measure could facilitate "viewpoint-based censorship" and potentially infringe upon protected speech.

The proposed Australian laws aim to shield users from harmful content by compelling tech companies to adjust their platform designs. However, the US submission argues that the lack of clear definitions for "harm" and "risks" creates a dangerous ambiguity. Officials expressed concern that companies might feel pressured to "pre-emptively demote" content from independent journalists or minority voices to avoid heavy fines, effectively curbing diverse perspectives.

Furthermore, the US cautioned that mandating specific design features could have global ramifications, impacting the user experience beyond Australia’s borders. The submission also noted that such regulations might discourage innovation and allow government officials to impose their own biases on digital platforms.

Advertisement

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, currently in New York for the UN General Assembly, defended the initiative. He maintained that the legislation is intended to empower individuals rather than expand state authority. "It's not about giving government control," Albanese stated. "It's about giving people back control over what they receive on their devices."

This legislative push follows Australia's recent implementation of a social media ban for children under 16, which was introduced last December. The US embassy has requested that Australia provide further clarification on how it intends to define "harm" to ensure that the regulations do not inadvertently suppress protected speech.

Source: BBC News